VAT News

CJEU decisions on VAT invoicing

In the recent CJEU case of Barlis, the Portuguese tax authorities sought to deny input tax deduction to the taxpayer as the invoice received from their supplier did not contain sufficient detail of the supply, or the timeframe of delivery.

The taxpayer offered additional information concerning the supply, but deduction was still denied. The CJEU ruled that this information should be accepted and deduction permitted, and in any case if the substantive requirements for deduction are met, this should be allowed.

In Senatex, the German taxpayer attempted to deduct input tax despite their purchase invoice not containing the supplier's VAT identification number. This was rejected by the German authorities.

The invoices were retrospectively amended and the authorities allowed deduction, but levied late payment interest. The CJEU ruled that such interest could not be levied.

Businesses should ensure that evidence supporting input tax deduction is in order to avoid issues with the tax authorities at a future date.

Related articles

Making Sense of Making Tax Digital

Making Tax Digital (MTD) is an initiative by HMRC to provide a more technologically-driven approach to tax in order to improve efficiency, reduce errors, increase transparency and streamline processes.

Read more
South Dakota vs Wayfair Inc.

To combat the inequality, South Dakota brought a case against Wayfair Inc which said that even if the supplier had no physical nexus in the classic sense, they should still collect and remit sales tax on online sales, to level the playing field with suppliers who do have a nexus.

Read more
Russia-VAT rate increase

The Russian standard rate is to increase

Read more